Abstract
Australian journalist Paul Sheehan's representation of the alleged and convicted immigrant Muslim/Arab rapists he demonises in 'Girls Like You', like his representation of the rape survivors in that text, has much to tell us about the law's production of rape law's speaking and signifying subjects, “real rape” victims and survivors, false accusers and perpetrators. This article uses a variety of texts, including 'Girls Like You', recent Australian rape law jurisprudence and legislative reform, texts involving two controversial recent US rape cases — one from Maryland and one from Nebraska — and a recent UK study on attrition in rape prosecutions, to explore some persistent legal problems in responding to the social harm of rape. It concludes that recent work on biopolitical models of rape law, applied to the New South Wales rape reform prompted in significant part by the Skaf and K rape cases, suggests that there is little hope of this law reform initiative reducing rape attrition. More disturbingly, via a somatechnological critique of the reform's production of “infralegal”, it also proposes that its ends can be differently understood.
Disciplines
Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | International Law | Jurisprudence | Law and Gender | Sexuality and the Law
Date of this Version
April 2010
Recommended Citation
Pether, Penelope J., "What is Due to Others: Speaking and Signifying Subject(s) of Rape Law" (2010). Working Paper Series. 155.
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/wps/art155
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, International Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons