Privacy and the Press

Loading...

Media is loading
 

Location

Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law

Event Website

https://www.villanovalawreview.com/

Publication Date

2025

Start Date

21-2-2025 1:00 PM

End Date

21-2-2025 2:15 PM

Description

The Supreme Court has consistently held that once truthful information of public interest is disclosed, the Constitution forbids any governmental restraint on its distribution by prohibiting publication or imposing sanctions. While the common law and some statutes recognize protections for individuals’ privacy, these cases seem to limit any remedy for publication of legitimately obtained, truthful information. This is so even if it involves disclosing sensitive private information or undermines society’s commitment to rehabilitating individuals charged with criminal activity and protecting those who may have been arrested or charged but were vindicated. Is there a way to reconcile constitutional protections of freedom of speech and the press with our legitimate concerns for preserving individual’s privacy, encouraging rehabilitation of those who have served their time for crimes and for removing the stain of alleged criminal activity from the reputations of innocent individuals swept up in circumstances beyond their control?

Comments

Moderated by Itay Ravid, Associate Professor of Law & Reuschlein Emerging Scholar, Villanova Law

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Feb 21st, 1:00 PM Feb 21st, 2:15 PM

Privacy and the Press

Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law

The Supreme Court has consistently held that once truthful information of public interest is disclosed, the Constitution forbids any governmental restraint on its distribution by prohibiting publication or imposing sanctions. While the common law and some statutes recognize protections for individuals’ privacy, these cases seem to limit any remedy for publication of legitimately obtained, truthful information. This is so even if it involves disclosing sensitive private information or undermines society’s commitment to rehabilitating individuals charged with criminal activity and protecting those who may have been arrested or charged but were vindicated. Is there a way to reconcile constitutional protections of freedom of speech and the press with our legitimate concerns for preserving individual’s privacy, encouraging rehabilitation of those who have served their time for crimes and for removing the stain of alleged criminal activity from the reputations of innocent individuals swept up in circumstances beyond their control?

https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/shachoy_symposium/2025/proceedings/5