The Voice of Criminal Law

Abstract

In whose voice does the criminal law speak, and why does it matter? Miriam Gur-Arye argues that the answer to the first question depends on the kind of duty violated by the crime at issue. In some cases (say, election fraud or tax evasion), the criminal law speaks in the voice of the polity—but in other cases (say, murder or rape), it speaks in the voice of human beings. Or so argues Gur-Ayre. Not surprisingly, perhaps, a lot depends on what one means by the voice of the criminal law. In this paper, I defend two related arguments. First, the criminal law typically claims to speak in the voice of the polity, even if, in practice, it often fails to do so. Second, where the criminal law does speak in the voice of the polity, its doing so can contribute to its own justification.

ISSN

1871-9791

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09692-6

Keywords

criminal law, criminal procedure law, ethics, philosophy of law, theories of law, legal history

Disciplines

Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Law | Law and Philosophy | Legal History

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS