Keywords
Duke University, Free press & fair trial, Journalism -- Objectivity, Fair trial, Social classes, Rape, Lacrosse players
Recommended Citation
James R. Devine,
The Duke Lacrosse Matter as a Case Study of the Right to Reply to Prejudicial Pretrial Extrajudicial Publicity under Rule 3.6(c),
15
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports L.J.
175
(2008).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj/vol15/iss2/1