The Duke Lacrosse Matter as a Case Study of the Right to Reply to Prejudicial Pretrial Extrajudicial Publicity under Rule 3.6(c)

Authors

James R. Devine

Keywords

Duke University, Free press & fair trial, Journalism -- Objectivity, Fair trial, Social classes, Rape, Lacrosse players

Recommended Citation

James R. Devine, The Duke Lacrosse Matter as a Case Study of the Right to Reply to Prejudicial Pretrial Extrajudicial Publicity under Rule 3.6(c), 15 Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports L.J. 175 (2008).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj/vol15/iss2/1