Abstract
Criminal prosecution has been used with increasing frequency recently in connection with a variety of business failures and other financial offenses. Indeed, it appears that there are few such offenses that cannot be prosecuted criminally even though they also give rise to civil remedies. While some such offenses seem to be quite serious frauds, others seem to be as minor as getting the accounting rules wrong. Thus, the question addressed in this essay is how to define a business crime and what should be the proper role of criminal prosecution in connection with business offenses. I start with the proposition that we should criminalize conduct only when lesser remedies do not work to deter the offense. I then describe the array of private civil remedies available, ranging from simple compensatory damages to punitive damages to class actions and derivative actions and find that there are few business offenses that cannot be well addressed by these devices. I conclude that as a general matter private civil remedies are much more efficient at addressing business and financial crimes. The expansion of criminal prosecution may be due to some extent to problems with the way civil remedies work in practice, but for the most part it is difficult to explain except as a result of failure to understand the role of criminal law and to define financial crimes with any precision.
Disciplines
Civil Law | Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Securities Law
Date of this Version
November 2007
Recommended Citation
BOOTH, RICHARD A., "What is a Business Crime?" (2007). Working Paper Series. 98.
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/wps/art98
Included in
Civil Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Securities Law Commons
Comments
3 J. Bus. Tech. L. xxx (2008).