Jury Nullification and the Rule of Law
Recommended Citation
Brenner M. Fissell,
Jury Nullification and the Rule of Law,
19(3)
Legal Theory
217
(2013).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/facpubs/172
Abstract
Despite an intractable judiciary, there is widespread consensus within the legal academy that jury nullification is compatible with the rule of law. This proposition is most strongly tested by “substantive nullifications,” where a jury nullifies simply because it disagrees with the law itself. While some substantive nullifications can comport with the rule of law, most commentators’ wholesale acceptance of the practice is not justified. They err by ignoring the nonsubstantive, procedural nature of the rule of law in favor of one determined by substantive “justice,” and also by taking a naıvely undifferentiated view of a “community’s” morality (even though jurisdictional and vicinage morality can diverge). In doing so, a healthy vision of antityrannical nullifications is presented, but this leaves out many problematic cases. Once these errors are rectified, a more nuanced picture emerges, and it becomes apparent that localism will often disrupt the congruence feature of the rule of law.
ISSN
1352-3252
DOI
10.1017/S135232521300013X
Disciplines
Law