1994 Decisions

 

As the official backup archive for the United States Court for the Third Circuit, Villanova University School of Law maintains digital copies of all opinions filed by the Court since May of 1994. New opinions are added monthly.

NOTE: Most opinions are marked "Precedential" or "Non-Precedential", either on the cover page, or somewhere on the first page of the opinion. Non-Precedential Opinions are only binding upon the parties involved, and should not be cited or relied upon for the legal principles stated within.

Also, even precedential opinions may have been overruled since the time the case was published. The legal validity of any of these opinions should be checked with a citator (e.g. Lexis' Shepard's or Westlaw's KeyCite)

If you notice any problems with these opinions, or have concerns related to this collection, please contact the adminstrator.

Follow


December

PDF

United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce

November

PDF

United States v. Rosero

PDF

T&N, PLC v. PA Insur. Guar. Assn.

PDF

United States v. Turcks

PDF

Pic-a-State et al. v. Commwlth of PA, et al.

December

PDF

Dupont v. Com. IRS

PDF

United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce

PDF

IRS v. Gaster

PDF

Edwards v. United States

PDF

Stardyne, Inc. v. NLRB

PDF

United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce

PDF

Sea-Land Svc. v. Barry

PDF

AT&T, Co. v. Winback and Conserve Program, Inc.

PDF

Bloom v. Conrail Corp.

PDF

Neely v. ClubMed

PDF

SIU de Puerto Rico v. V.I. Port Auth.

PDF

United States v. Frey

PDF

Nickeo v. V.I. Tel. Corp.

PDF

Gov't V.I. v. Davis

PDF

Barna v. City of Perth Amboy et al.

PDF

Baby Neal v. Casey

PDF

Duraco Prod. Inc. v. Joy Plastic Ent.

PDF

Phillipines v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

PDF

United States v. Thomas

PDF

Torre v. Casio, Inc.

PDF

Feldman v. Phila. Housing Auth. al.

PDF

IN RE: Asbestos School Litigation

PDF

IN RE: Asbestos School Litigation

PDF

United States v. Bogusz

PDF

Phila. Gear, Corp v. Phila. Gear, Mexico, S.A.

PDF

Hudson v. Chase Manhattan

PDF

Machinists Pension Fund, Dist. 15 v. Khale Engineering Corp.